Al-Houthi mobilizes his media to defend the "directions of his leaders to prostitution" revealed by the Al-Hammadi case
English - Thursday 03 June 2021 الساعة 09:25 am![](https://newsyemen.life/admin/images/uploads/766e84f21dbf64865a6c4e2f99908ed6.webp)
The Houthi militia - the Iranian arm in Yemen - continues to defame the Yemeni activist in the field of fashion and folklore, Intisar Al Hammadi, who has been detained in the prisons of the Houthi militia since last February 20.
TV channels affiliated with the Houthi militia are leading a widespread defamation campaign against the activist Al-Hammadi, 19, who works in the field of tailoring and fashion design in traditional Yemeni clothes.
The (Houthi Identity) channel hosted security officials working under the administration of the Houthi militia in television interviews, in which they tried to put many charges against (Intisar Al Hammadi) and others, including "involvement in prostitution, promoting and using drugs."
The judge and human rights activist, Abdel Wahab Qatran, said that the case of Intisar Al Hammadi had left the security authorities’ possession and jurisdiction, and had become the possession and jurisdiction of the Public Prosecution, noting that the Public Prosecution Office of West Amana decided to ban publication about the case, “which is what Intisar’s lawyer, Mr. Khaled Kamal, adhered to.”
He explained that (Al-Hawiya channel) violated the decision of the Public Prosecution, and underestimated it and threw it at the wall, and installed itself as an investigator and judge to convict Intisar Al-Hammadi, noting that (Houthi identity) committed several crimes related to the confidentiality of investigations, and the inadmissibility of publishing what affects the reputation and dignity of citizens, accusing them For crimes against honor and honesty before final court rulings are issued to convict them.
In his comment on (Facebook) Qatran criticized Al-Hawiya channel’s disregard for the opinions of the investigative judges in the Public Prosecution, the accused’s lawyer, and the opinion of the accused herself, and added: “The channel went in an open, naive way to conduct interviews with security officers, informants and what it called Aqal Harat, and it forgot for its naivety and lack of professionalism, The security authorities are accused of fabrication and fabrication.”
And he concluded that "the identity of the general was confirmed from where he did not know, which is a victory innocence from all that they promoted of drugs, hashish and prostitution, and the fabrication, lies and fabrication became clear to everyone who listened while he was seeing."
According to jurists, "no security apparatus has the right to be a party to a dispute about cases and files that have become in the hands of the judiciary," and that the responsibility of the control agencies ends as soon as the files are referred to the Public Prosecution, stressing in this context that the only point of conviction is the natural judiciary according to a trial that abides by the conditions of the trial. fair.