“Independent Arabia ” reads Yemen with the eyes of the "Brotherhood": the alliance with Houthi is a "political maneuver"!
English - Tuesday 11 February 2020 الساعة 04:45 pm
aden,newsyenmen
The Arabic-language electronic newspaper - newly born - and despite the privilege of the ancient name, has suffered since its faltering start a professional and political deficiency in dealing with Yemen and its vision and reading only using the viewpoint of the Brotherhood or through their lenses.
The "Independent Arabia" platform is unique with a remarkable report that seeks opinions on a thorny and sensitive issue in the Yemeni file related to the nature of the supposed relationship between the Brotherhood and the Houthis, in light of accumulated military and political facts and data. One of the Brotherhood's allies, in addition to a spokesperson affiliated with the Houthis, to decide or perpetuate the editorial style directed at the press article is the denial - simply and lightly - and reject, if not say, the ridiculous opinions and conclusions that were noticed and note an implicit and harmonious coordination between the two parties.
The electronic newspaper of British origin, Saudi ownership and administration, which was launched earlier in 2019, devoted space to Brotherhood leaders, political and military, among them the head of the media department of the Islah Party Ali al-Jaradi and the military leader Sadiq Sarhan, the most prominent tools of Brotherhood influence in the Taiz military axis and others, as if you were reading a report In an Islah newspaper that is limited to the opinion of the party and not in an international newspaper that is supposed to give equal spaces to different opinions and parties on the legitimacy front in Yemen regarding the single issue and the subject of debate and investigation.
It is not difficult for the reader to notice lightness and negligence in preparing, drafting and presenting the targeted journalistic article, and a Yemeni journalist notes that the report "predicts professionalism and neutrality in the simplest limits and adopts the method of indoctrination and domestication with readers and followers, which puts more signs of exclamation and questioning in front of the policy of editing an Arab newspaper in the name of one of the oldest newspapers in Britain and the West and what is professional news? But this is one occasion added to many precedents and omissions that enshrined a negative perception that was met with reservations and doubts that affect the editorial policy and orientation of the newspaper regarding Yemen.
The "Independent Arabia" report came under the title "The Brotherhood and Houthi ... a true coalition or a political maneuver in Yemen?" As it seems, the topic adopts the topic, starting with the title Marketing for political graduation, that does not negate the evidence and data of the alliance between the two parties, but goes to seeking interpretations and re-naming the meanings as a "political maneuver". "Is changing the name and description only a maneuver instead of an alliance that changes the value and content of the connotations and the nature of the facts as long as it does not deny them?" Asked the political editor in Newsyemen.
With a subtitle, "Observers see the truce as a Houthi lie aimed at psychological warfare and covering their losses and stirring up confusion" does not lead in the context to independent observers and the speech is on the side of the Brotherhood's speakers themselves and their allies, the journalist Mohammed Al-Dhubiani, and Ali Al-Ahmadi, a member of the National Alliance for Legal Supportive Political Parties, in addition to the Dean Sadiq Sarhan, and Ali Al-Jaradi.
The other paradox is not different from its predecessor as the report or the poll itself devotes exclusivity to the Brotherhood and the Houthis by limiting the reformists and supporting and attached names to them and to a speaker who is now secondary in the Houthi front (Muhammad al-Maqalih), and ignores or deliberately ignores the opinions and statements of other parties, political And partisan, civil, tribal and media, active and important in Yemen and specifically in the Yemeni legitimacy Front.
In the context, the report also attributes the speakers to marketing the idea and hypothesis of the unspoken official agreement between Legitimacy as a whole and the Houthis to impose a truce and calm on all fronts after the Stockholm talks and their outputs, and that the matter was not limited to the Hodeidah agreement.
This matter includes blasphemy and adopts the condemnation of legitimacy by collusion and abandoning the battle with the putschists implicitly and without a reasoned declaration or explanation depending on the need for reform / the Brotherhood to face the explicit accusations about stopping the fronts and disrupting them, leading to the collapse and refraction of the army forces controlled by the Brotherhood in the front of Naham and to Al-Jawf, Marib and dangerous expansion of Houthi militias and sudden on strategic fronts with ease and without real battles.
It is also intended to generalize responsibility for the entire legitimacy, in light of the accusation by the Houthi leader, Mohamed Al-Bakheiti, of the Islah Party of violating the unannounced truce with his group for the ceasefire snd Al-Bakhiti referred exclusively and clearly to the Islah party, and in particular about their insatiable.
Before referring to the induction of the Houthi leader, as defined by the newspaper, Muhammad al-Maqaleh, on the common interest and a common goal of the Houthis and the Brotherhood in "crushing Tariq Saleh's forces" in the West Coast.
