Muhammad Ali’s judicial and media system and support for Abdul-Malik..blood and terrorism in the struggle of land documents
English - Saturday 03 September 2022 الساعة 09:41 am
Sana'a, NewsYemen, a special report:
The case of the killing of Judge Dr. Muhammad Hamran, a member of the Supreme Court at the hands of an armed gang, was revealed, as the story of the Iranian arm in Yemen says, to confirm the reality of terrorism faced by the judiciary and its members by militias that continue the policy of bulldozing the judiciary and turning it into a subordinate authority that uses it to legitimize its policies and procedures. The unconstitutional and illegal rights of citizens in its areas of control in general and its opponents and opponents of its authority in particular.
Since its coup and its takeover of Sanaa on September 21, 2014, Iran's arm in Yemen has begun systematic measures to bully the judiciary and extend its influence over it.
The Houthi series of tampering began with cutting judges’ salaries, passing through the appointments of judges loyal to them in the most important parts of the judiciary, and the dismissal and exclusion of judges who do not believe in the myths of the Khomeinist ideological group.
She went to the Institute of the Judiciary and left batches of judges affiliated with it, by controlling the admission policies of the Higher Institute of the Judiciary and limiting it to its members.
Its coup measures culminated in the overthrow of the republican judicial system, by appointing what it called the head of the judicial system and assigning this position to the leader in the militias and a member of the so-called Supreme Political Council, Muhammad Ali al-Houthi, who has nothing to do with the judiciary, neither closely nor from afar.
The Muhammad Ali al-Houthi regime waged a systematic political and media campaign against the judges, which intensified during the last days of last August. Muhammad Ali launched a campaign targeting some judges and interfered with the documentation of land and endowment ownership.
On his Twitter account, Muhammad al-Houthi published several tweets in which he attacked the judges, demanding that some of them be referred for investigation by the Public Prosecutor, claiming that they are corrupt. He criticized the position and procedures of the Judicial Council, threatening special reports against the judges, saying that they have no immunity.
Muhammad Ali's campaign against the judiciary was accompanied by campaigns to redistribute public and private lands, with rugs and looting.
Houthi-controlled areas are witnessing a frantic struggle for territory between the group’s leaders, judges and landlords in Sana’a, Hodeidah, Mahwit, Hajjah, and Ibb on an almost daily basis.
A number of judges, including Judge Dr. Muhammad Hamran, a member of the Supreme Court, were those who stood up to the procedures for burglary of property and refused to be identified by issuing rulings that legalize their procedures, and they refused to hand over what documents they had concerning the property of citizens.
Al-Hawiya channel, which is funded by the militias and run by one of their members, is in charge of implementing the campaign against judges in general and against some of them in particular.
The channel plays a designated role in targeting whom the Houthi militias want to target, whether they are political opponents, as happened with the leaders of the General People’s Congress, which reached the point of threatening to kill them on the air.
NewsYemen sources in the Public Prosecution confirmed the registration of complaints from a number of judges against the channel and its director, calling for an investigation with him on charges of incitement and abuse. The Office of the Public Prosecutor is satisfied with the calls of the General, who did not respond to any of them.
Land issues are at the forefront of the issues that the channel incites against its judges and launches systematic campaigns against them and defames them on the background of their handling of public opinion issues, the most important of which are land issues.
NewsYemen monitored the channel's performance against land judges, as it follows up on it and covers the judiciary's performance as an accused of tampering with land.
The editor monitored an attempt to influence the members of the Judicial Committee in charge of resolving the land issue of the presidential office, where he asked them to come to his channel, and when they refused, he replied to them by saying: “All of the Minister of Justice comes to my house to be stored with me, and you refuse to come to the channel. Who is Muhammad al-Imad and who is the identity channel?
Al-Houthi’s campaigns against judges focused on judges who hear cases of landscaping and looting by militia leaders, or those who have documents related to the ownership of land that the militias seize and spread on the grounds that it is lands belonging to endowments or that it is state property.
The movements of Muhammad Ali and his regime enjoy the support of his cousin, the leader of the group, Abdul Malik, who granted it immunity from the judicial procedures that were brought against it, whether by a number of judges or by citizens, businessmen and merchants who were subjected to fraud, extortion and defamation.
Barely a week passed since the campaign launched by the so-called head of the judicial system, the leader, Muhammad al-Houthi, and the Al-Hawiya channel, until the crime of kidnapping and killing Judge Dr. Muhammad Hamran, a member of the Supreme Court, was carried out in a way that Yemen had never seen before.
But it is not the first incident in the era of the Iranian arm, where the judiciary witnessed the killing, assault and kidnapping of a number of judges, whether by some of the opponents or by elements affiliated with the militias, depending on the arrogance of the power and dominance of arms, threats and the policies of killing opponents.
