"The Three References"...the legitimacy mine to disrupt the Riyadh consultations
English - Wednesday 06 April 2022 الساعة 01:48 pm
Aden, NewsYemen, special:
The legitimacy system intensified invoking the "three references", with the aim of disrupting the Yemeni consultations held in the Saudi capital, Riyadh, under the auspices of the Gulf Cooperation Council.
The legitimacy realizes that the absence of the Houthi party from the consultations will push the sponsors to direct the course of the consultations towards reforming legitimacy and the institution of the presidency and involving new forces capable of bringing about military change on the ground.
Interim President Abd Rabbo Mansour Hadi and some ministers made statements affirming adherence to the solution through the three references, which were overtaken by reality on the ground, while politicians considered them an attempt to thwart the process of correcting the path of legitimacy.
The media team of the Southern Transitional Council recorded the first objection to the statements of the Minister of Information in the legitimate government, Muammar al-Iryani, during the consultations.
Al-Eryani reiterated the legitimacy of the solution through the three references, which was rejected by the southern team, describing Al-Eryani's statements as frustrating, and do not establish partnership and unity against the Houthi militia.
The head of the southern team, Mukhtar al-Yafei, said that the Southern Transitional Council came from the capital, Aden, and is open to everyone and tolerant of everyone, but al-Eryani's statements were of no value, and he was not sincere in them.
Al-Yafei added, in a television statement, that the media axis of the consultations witnessed great progress during the past three days, but the Iranian presence on the fourth day thwarted all work and efforts and made statements, which we objected to.
In addition, a member of the National Assembly of the Transitional Council, Wathiq Al-Hasani, said that the legitimacy decided to circumvent and destroy the Riyadh consultations, by sticking to the three references as a last plan to thwart the Riyadh consultations after realizing that the consultations carried their last coffin.
The southern military and political analyst, Brigadier General Khaled al-Nassi, accused the leaders in control of the legitimacy decision, led by Ali Mohsen al-Ahmar and the Islah party, of being the biggest obstacle to the success of the Riyadh consultations.
Al-Nassi said in a tweet on Twitter, that the goal of the Riyadh consultations was to reach a peace agreement, but the concerned party did not attend, and they are the Houthis, and therefore the goal of the consultations today should be to confront the Houthis.
Al-Nassi made it clear that confronting Al-Houthi will not succeed with the failed, corrupt and treacherous tools that control the legitimate presidency, government and military institution.
The southern academic, Fadl al-Rubaie, believes that the absence of al-Houthi will push the brothers in the coalition to develop the Riyadh agreement signed between legitimacy and the transitional, and reform the system of legitimacy.
Al-Rubaie said that the Southern Transitional Council is in control of the southern lands, and the absence of the Houthi as a main party controlling 80% of the northern lands about the Riyadh consultations to develop the Riyadh agreement signed between legitimacy and the transitional and reforming legitimacy.
The southern politician Saeed Bakran says that the defeat of the Houthis in the north requires cleaning the ranks of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard's tools in legitimacy, not unity with the deadly tools of Tehran in legitimacy.
