Al-Sharafi: The south fought al-Houthi as an invasion and occupation, and for this he won
English - Saturday 19 February 2022 الساعة 04:05 pm![](https://newsyemen.life/admin/images/uploads/766e84f21dbf64865a6c4e2f99908ed6.webp)
Fahd Talib al-Sharafi, advisor to the Minister of Information in the legitimate government, confirmed that the south had defeated al-Houthi because it had fought it as a project of conquest and occupation of the homeland and faith.
Al-Sharafi said, in a series of tweets on Twitter, that the advantage of the south is that it fought al-Houthi, his project, and his militias, as a project of invasion and occupation, and an enemy of the homeland and faith. Thus, the people of the south fought him with a strong fighting doctrine that broke his tyranny and spurted his nose.
He pointed out that the problem of the north is that it stems from the legitimacy of the literature, which sees the Houthis as a Yemeni political component that we are fighting against in order to sit with us at the dialogue table.
He added, and therefore, from the first day, I was calling for the transfer of the experience of the Southern Resistance with all its literature and its application in the North, so these calls were demonized and accused of collusion and treason.
In a second tweet, Al-Sharafi said, "The south has so far proven extraordinary cohesion in the face of the continuous Houthi penetration attempts, despite the difficult conditions that the people of the south lived through."
He indicated that the reason for his pride in the south and its people is this resistance that does not accept bargaining, and this does not mean that Al-Houthi does not work day and night to establish cells and threaten the security of the south.
Al-Sharafi pointed out that it is a grave mistake to accuse the whole north, its people, political leaders and citizens of treason and lack of seriousness in confronting the Houthi militia, as a regional reaction by some or the result of frustration and lack of understanding by others, and this hypothesis stupidly kills the chances of victory.
He explained that the defect is in the tools, leadership and mechanisms of managing and leading the battle in the north, not in the people.
He concluded by tweeting, and in order to prove to you that the defect is not from the people, the simple people, and those excluded from decision-making in the north, and that holding them responsible for the delay in liberating their areas is unfair and unfair. Consider: Shabwa, the proud with its heroic family and men, was living in the same situation, had it not been for the change that occurred and the panic of the giants, it would have been the same as Al-Bayda or Al-Jawf today.