The funeral of Judge Al-Omrani..a popular trial of Houthi hatred
English - Wednesday 14 July 2021 الساعة 03:17 pm
Sana'a, NewsYemen, a special report:
Despite the absolute security, military and political control imposed by the Houthi militia, the Iranian arm in Yemen, over its areas of control, especially the capital, Sana’a, the residents of the capital always wait for any opportunity or justification to express their rejection of the de facto authority of the Houthis, their policies, practices, corruption and violations that they practice against them. all people.
The death of the urban mark revealed a silent opposition to the militias
In this context, the people’s way of dealing with the case of the death of the scholar, Judge Muhammad bin Ismail Al-Omrani, the former Grand Mufti of the Republic, and their expression of great sadness over him, came to reflect not only the extent of their love for what Al-Omrani Judge represents from a tolerant school only, but also to present visible messages, albeit silent about the size of the school. Popular discontent and rejection within the capital, Sanaa, of the Houthi militia, its policies, practices, and violations.
The response and abuse of simple people, the public, and public opinion leaders in the capital, Sanaa, to the death of the former Grand Mufti of the Republic, Judge Muhammad bin Ismail Al-Omrani, embodied the size of the silent opposition that people hide to the Houthi militia, whose confusion appeared in its many contradictions in dealing with the people’s position after the death of Al-Omrani.
Immediately after the announcement of the death of the urban judge, social networking sites began witnessing an unprecedented momentum in the dissemination of condolences and publications expressing the size of the loss that people felt at the departure of the urban mufti and the extent of their love for him and for what he represented from a school of jurisprudence characterized by tolerance and rejection of intolerance and sectarian extremism.
Politicians, media professionals, activists, jurists, judges, activists, and even the general public expressed their love for the urban judge and for what he represented and embodies from a religious and jurisprudential position that is different from the reality they live today under the rule of the Houthi militia in their condolences and publications, through which each of them wrote his rejection of what is witnessed today. From sectarian fanaticism and religious extremism imposed by the Houthi militia on the one hand and the Muslim Brotherhood movement on the other, and the attempt by each of them to impose their religious ideologies and their intellectual and sectarian fanaticism on people by force.
Despite the obstacles that the Houthi militia sought to place in front of the popular and public presence in prayer for the body of the deceased Judge Muhammad Al-Omrani, his funeral and burial in the cemetery, the mass and popular outpouring was so great that the militias could not hide the extent of popular love for the urban judge, his thought, his school, and his religious tolerance from On the one hand, and the extent to which people express their rejection and opposition to the militias, even if by silent methods, they turn into a visible opposition in any situation in which they wait for the opportunity to express their rejection and opposition to the militias, as happened in the field and media presence with the death, funeral and burial of the urban judge
Al-Houthi and Al-Omrani.. From exclusion to hidden hatred
Judge Muhammad bin Ismail al-Omrani, who was the Mufti of the Republic of Yemen when the Houthi militia overthrew and seized power in September 2014, is one of the most prominent Yemeni scholars and jurists and mujtahids who were distinguished by adopting a school of tolerance and rejecting sectarian fanaticism and religious extremism and keenness to embody the moderation and moderation of Islam, which is the matter. Who did not like the Houthi militias, which quickly removed him from his position and appointed a general mufti and one of its most prominent extremist leaders is Shams al-Din Sharaf al-Din, who is known for his fanatical positions on the Twelver doctrine that the militias condemn and distinguishes the relationship of their subordination to Iran and the concept of Wilayat al-Faqih on which the Khomeinist revolution is based and its belief in it. The rest of the arms and its affiliated militias that it planted in the countries of the region, as is the case with the Popular Mobilization Forces and the rest of the Iraqi Shiite factions, Hezbollah in Lebanon, and the Houthi militias in Yemen.
The position of the Houthi militias on the death of the urban scholar was blatantly contradictory. Although the condolences of the head of the so-called political council of militias, Mahdi Al-Mashat, on the death of Al-Omrani, it was brief and not commensurate with the position and position of the urban judge represented by science, jurisprudence and religion, and it does not amount to a lower level of condolence sent by his death. Any of the jurisprudential figures loyal to the militias, to the state of contradiction that appeared clear in the tweets of leaders and activists affiliated with the Houthi militia.
The overwhelming popular position, grief over the departure of Judge Al-Omrani, angered the Houthi leaders. With the leader and founder of the militia, Hussein Badr Al-Din Al-Houthi, and the claim that the latter was better than the urban judge, which provoked the feelings of people who rushed to attack him in an unprecedented way, which forced him to delete his publication after witnessing the massive rejection of his allegations.
Although the Houthi leader Hussein Al-Ezzi tried to politically exploit the death of the urban judge by claiming that he died due to his inability to travel for treatment abroad due to the siege, this attempt was nothing but a mask with which he tried to cover up the extent of hatred shown by the tweets and publications of activists affiliated with the Houthi militias. Those who mocked most of their publications to criticize Al-Omrani Judge with the justification of not declaring a position against the aggression, and his fatwa in which he called on people to abide by their homes when he was asked about the legitimate position on the conflict and the fighting going on between the Houthi militias and the rest of the Yemeni parties and considering that fatwa as bias towards the opponents and opponents of the militias.
Analysts described to NewsYemen the position of the Houthi militias towards the death of the scholar Muhammad Al-Omrani, that it did not reflect the state of hatred they held for him due to his refusal to take sides with them religiously and doctrinally on the one hand, and in return for their failure to extract a position in support of their war and killing against the rest of the Yemeni people who reject their coup, according to NewsYemen Because of their rejection and opposition to the moderate and tolerant religious and jurisprudence school that embodied the moderation and moderation of Islam, especially since it is affiliated with a geographical area of the Zaydi sect and began its scientific and jurisprudential life as a quiet Shiite before turning into a middle world characterized by its tolerance and rejection of sectarian fanaticism and its keenness to issue fatwas with the best rulings and doctrinal positions of every sect. When it is in the interest of the people.
The analysts conclude by saying: On the political side, there is no doubt that the leaders of the Houthi militias, who failed to curb the popular interaction by attending the funeral of the deceased Omrani and the political and media interaction on the media and communication sites, made the militias feel the size of the silent opposition to them and their practices and crimes and the people’s rejection of their corruption, racism, sectarian extremism, their dependence and their workers. Iran, not to mention the people’s view of the Houthis that they are just militias and gangs that rule by force and oppression, and that they cannot one day be an authority that runs a state in which everyone is equal, which was clearly reflected in the contradictions of the militias’ positions towards politicians, activists and tweeters towards the departure of the judge and the urban mark.
